Operational value
Faster investigation of conflicting records
IBDCP architecture
Provenance for decisions, not just records
IBDCP provenance links a business fact to its source, transformations, responsible authority and policy context. The result is evidence that people, applications and AI workflows can inspect before acting.
The business problem
Dashboards and models may combine data from many sources without preserving an understandable evidence path. That weakens auditability and makes errors expensive to locate.
How IBDCP addresses it
IBDCP records provenance at meaningful business transitions, associates derived outputs with source evidence and exposes verification status to authorised consumers.
Capture source identity and integrity
Record governed transformations
Link decisions to supporting evidence
Verify the chain without exposing unnecessary data
Decision relevance
Trust value
Explainable inputs for AI-assisted decisions
Architecture value
Reusable evidence across audit and partner workflows
Security and governance boundary
Provenance proves lineage and integrity, not the factual correctness of every source assertion. Source quality and human review remain essential.
Implementation evidence
AICRM and Lioraz use governed context to support decisions; IBDCP provides the architectural pattern for retaining where trusted inputs came from.
Related evidence and capabilities
Next decision
Evaluate one bounded business process.
Start with the workflow where fragmented authority, custody or provenance is already creating cost, delay or risk.
Assess the business case